Hate Speech is Useful Speech
Hate has always existed, progress only when free speech did. By allowing the expression of hate we get useful information.
“It is challenging to defend the free speech of those with whom one disagrees. But freedom of expression is the foundation of all our freedoms – therefore, we must ensure its protection.” — Isabelle Hirs, Managing Director Freedom in Practice, Rising Tide Foundation
Hate has always existed, progress only when free speech did. By allowing the expression of hate we get useful information.
Freedom of speech is a precondition for intellectual progress. Yet it has itself become an ideological weapon in today’s arena of political conflict.
Michael Shellenberger helped to publish the “Twitter Files”, which exposed the U.S. government’s large-scale efforts to censor social media. However, he’s more worried about the growing hostility to free speech in the EU.
Restrictions on freedom of speech are often justified by invoking the sensitivities of certain groups. This narrows public debate and ultimately harms
History shows that when religion and state power form an alliance, freedom of speech is in danger. It is worth remembering this today, as «errors» are once again being fought with legal means.
In Germany, anyone can say whatever they like, until the police ring the doorbell at six in the morning. Politicians intimidate citizens who speak their minds and enlist entire armies of NGOs for their purposes.
It is far easier to remain silent and avoid standing out in the sea of conformists shaped by the prevailing spirit of the age. Courage always dies first, and then freedom.
In China, freedom of expression formally exists – but only as long as it does not challenge the regime. Criticism should primarily signal to the leadership where action is needed.
Hate speech is a real problem. But takedowns and deplatforming are ineffective and carry damaging side effects. A better and more liberal response is to confront hateful speech directly.